Activity

  • lake posted an update in the group Group logo of Your ExperimentsYour Experiments 11 years ago

    If all the relationships were different, but open, and equally healthy, and rewarding.

    WOULD YOU RATHER

    Have one, two, three, or five partners?

    • Is the option of “four partners” deliberately not a choice?

    • I would rather have five partners under the open, healthy, rewarding circumstances you described.

    • We all can’t be you: the luckiest man on earth.

    • lake replied 11 years ago

      I just didn’t think four was distinct enough to include as an option, but if four is your number, by all means take it!

    • lake replied 11 years ago

      I’m going for three, using the Golidilocks rationale, it’s ‘just right’ đŸ™‚

    • 2, no one is 100% right for each other, but should be able to add up to that with 2…not to mention the 3somes!